Kincain should have wrote:
No, Zuckerberg is the guy who stole a multi-billion dollar idea. He can wear whatever he wants, and it won't mean a thing to Wall Street.
Kincain should have wrote:
No, Zuckerberg is the guy who stole a multi-billion dollar idea. He can wear whatever he wants, and it won't mean a thing to Wall Street.
Who is in charge?
He managed to grind Morgan Stanley and others down to 1% on fees.
He does not need to go public - it is more to compensate employees.
There are few good IPOs every year and this is one of them. If it were not, they would not be pricing it so aggressively.
This is the same guy who said, "Not Interested" when Yahoo offered him $1bn 6 years ago.
It is really not about the money for Zuck.
Kincain wrote:
No, Zuckerberg is the guy who invented a multi-billion dollar company. He can wear whatever he wants, and it won't mean a thing to Wall Street.
It's not a military billion dollar company yet is it? Isn't their revenue only like 1 billion?
Kincain wrote:
No, Zuckerberg is the guy who invented a multi-billion dollar company. He can wear whatever he wants, and it won't mean a thing to Wall Street.
Sshd wrote:
It's not a military billion dollar company yet is it? Isn't their revenue only like 1 billion?
All the trading on secondmarket.com values it at $100bn
It has been a $x0bn company for a long time.
Pander Bear wrote:
Flagpole wrote:Guess I did miss the "OP" in there. Sorry brother. Gave you the benefit of the doubt that you actually MEANT the book "The Emperor Wears No Clothes", but you actually made the mistake (you admitted later) where you actually meant "The Emperor's New Clothes". Just sayin'. :)
Don't apologize. You screw up all the time. We're used to it.
I am a woman, so please don't call me brother.
Sorry. Does bitch suit you better?
Sshd wrote:
It's not a military billion dollar company yet is it? Isn't their revenue only like 1 billion?
Revenue and value aren't the same thing. And what the heck is a military billion dollar company?
Flagpole wrote:
1) I'm not a genius anything.
2) I don't trade, I invest.
3) I am nowhere on the fashion scale. Shorts and t-shirts in the summer, jeans or sweats and long sleeve t-shirts or short sleeve t-shirts with a sweatshirt of some sort (sometimes a hoodie). I will put on a polo and khakis for church, but that's about as fancy as I get with clothes. Just not into fashion...never have been.
Thanks for sharing!
Flagpole . wrote:
Sorry. Does bitch suit you better?
/popcorn
Shoebacca wrote:
/popcorn
Don't hold your breath. Obviously that wasn't Flagpole.
No real man would talk to the woman that way. And the lazy use of a period shows that that guy is just a weak troll.
Yep. I don't talk to women that way or to most men that way for that matter. You aren't the most pleasant person I've ever conversed with on the interweb, but I wouldn't call you a b!tch. Just not in my nature.Besides, I give you a pass because you're probably tired from bringing your man a few beers and a sandwich.Ha! Just kidding with that last thing. I kid.
Pander Bear wrote:
Shoebacca wrote:/popcorn
Don't hold your breath. Obviously that wasn't Flagpole.
No real man would talk to the woman that way. And the lazy use of a period shows that that guy is just a weak troll.
Flagpole wrote:
Yep. I don't talk to women that way or to most men that way for that matter. You aren't the most pleasant person I've ever conversed with on the interweb, but I wouldn't call you a b!tch. Just not in my nature.
Besides, I give you a pass because you're probably tired from bringing your man a few beers and a sandwich.
Ha! Just kidding with that last thing. I kid.
Want to meet sometime?
Sure. My place or yours?