rojo wrote:
Truly ridiculous that this even got into the courts in the first place.
http://bottomline.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/04/05/11040527-calif-kids-can-have-happy-meals-judge-rules?litePretty soon, fun will be outlawed.
Rojo,
I don't think you understand what happened here.
The judge sustained McD's "demurrers." In California-speak, "demurrers" are like a motion for summary judgement. The action was decided by the judge after McD's filed a six page long submission, without discovery and without really "getting into the courts."
http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/04/06/Parham%20v.%20McDonald%27s-120404-ruling.pdfIf you are in favor of this decision-- then the court did everything you could possibly want it to. In other words-- this would provide evidence of things being *right* in this country.
In other words-- you should be applauding how great this country's legal system is.