Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 |
f3wr4wr43
So...is ABDI dirty too? 5/31/2012 6:57PM Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Abdi's two Arizona-based training partners, Marty Fagan and Ezkyas Sisay, have BOTH been busted for EPO. He also raves about Lagat who had the positive "A" sample and negative "B" sample.

http://www.usada.org/media/sanction-sisay5312012

http://olympictrials.runnersworld.com/2012/01/12/a-brief-chat-with-abdi-abdirahman/

Something is a little fishy here.
Ben Wrong
RE: So...is ABDI dirty too? 5/31/2012 7:06PM - in reply to f3wr4wr43 Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
You have a point.

Abdi should be replaced by Ritz by US Olympic Commitee. To avoid possible scandals.
tdti swk
RE: So...is ABDI dirty too? 5/31/2012 8:45PM - in reply to Ben Wrong Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Begs the question...

Ben Wrong wrote:

You have a point.

Abdi should be replaced by Ritz by US Olympic Commitee. To avoid possible scandals.
ehhh
RE: So...is ABDI dirty too? 5/31/2012 8:48PM - in reply to f3wr4wr43 Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Often quite dirty. And smelly. But we might be talking about different things.
Wonderer of things
RE: So...is ABDI dirty too? 6/1/2012 12:10AM - in reply to ehhh Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
.......?
Trollist
RE: So...is ABDI dirty too? 6/1/2012 12:23AM - in reply to Wonderer of things Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Yes, but you can't get rid of him without a positive test or catch him possessing the stuff.
Jerkstore, MD
RE: So...is ABDI dirty too? 6/1/2012 12:37AM - in reply to tdti swk Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

tdti swk wrote:

Begs the question...


You apparently don't know what "begs the question" means.

Hint: it does not mean "that raises the question . . . " or anything remotely similar.
someone had to do it
RE: So...is ABDI dirty too? 6/1/2012 1:13AM - in reply to Jerkstore, MD Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
he is also good friends with another arizona based runner that tested positive for EPO
saladdbar
RE: So...is ABDI dirty too? 6/1/2012 5:19AM - in reply to Ben Wrong Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Ben Wrong wrote:

You have a point.

Abdi should be replaced by Ritz by US Olympic Commitee. To avoid possible scandals.


I pray that you're being sarcastic. But with the brains of some of the Nike/Ritz fanboys on this site, I'm afraid the kids may take you seriously.

That would be the only way Ritz is getting to the Olympics, though.
insightlessness
RE: So...is ABDI dirty too? 6/1/2012 5:29AM - in reply to f3wr4wr43 Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I wouldn't passionately defend someone I don't know, but it does seem that Abdi doesn't actually care enough about running to take the time to cheat.
begging the question
RE: So...is ABDI dirty too? 6/1/2012 5:38AM - in reply to tdti swk Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
" I think he uses drugs because he is dirty. "
Yuyo
RE: So...is ABDI dirty too? 6/1/2012 5:51AM - in reply to f3wr4wr43 Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
That would really suck if it turned out abdi was dirty too. I never suspected him and all of his accomplishments just seemed plausible to me that he would be clean.

If someone like abdi were caught, I would start to question a lot more runners than before.
BlackMamba
RE: So...is ABDI dirty too? 6/1/2012 6:12AM - in reply to f3wr4wr43 Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Lagat has been tested very frequently since incident in 2003... Abdi runs just 100miles/week and that's not much for a marathoner....but there is still no proof that he doped.... so stfu until there will be positive test.
categorically
RE: So...is ABDI dirty too? 6/1/2012 6:55AM - in reply to BlackMamba Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Even if Abdi is completely clean and always has been a lot of people are going to say "Where there's smoke there's fire"

In this case there isn't just smoke. Abdi is right in the middle of a burning building.
Renee Richards
RE: So...is ABDI dirty too? 6/1/2012 7:15AM - in reply to categorically Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

categorically wrote:

Even if Abdi is completely clean and always has been a lot of people are going to say "Where there's smoke there's fire"

In this case there isn't just smoke. Abdi is right in the middle of a burning building.

indeed....
trollism
RE: So...is ABDI dirty too? 6/1/2012 7:15AM - in reply to BlackMamba Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

BlackMamba wrote:

Lagat has been tested very frequently since incident in 2003... Abdi runs just 100miles/week and that's not much for a marathoner....but there is still no proof that he doped.... so stfu until there will be positive test.


Dope tests don't catch anyone else they're stupid.

Losing two training partners is a bit sketchy, you have to admit.
southwestern hospitality
RE: So...is ABDI dirty too? 6/1/2012 7:16AM - in reply to f3wr4wr43 Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Who knows, but Abdi's typically extends an invitation to anyone he meets to come out and train with him. Opportunistic people (those who are doping), will probably also take advantage of Abdi's hospitality. Perhaps he should be more careful with who he's around, but it doesn't necessarily mean he's guilty.
gramthlete
RE: So...is ABDI dirty too? 6/1/2012 7:23AM - in reply to Yuyo Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Yuyo wrote:

That would really suck if it turned out abdi was dirty too. I never suspected him and all of his accomplishments just seemed plausible to me that he would be clean.

If someone like abdi were caught, I would start to question a lot more runners than before.


See: Eddy Hellebuyck

http://www.runnersworld.com/article/0,7120,s6-239-567--13729-0,00.html
Azaleas
RE: So...is ABDI dirty too? 6/1/2012 7:25AM - in reply to trollism Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Keep in mind that Abdi's not in any official training group. Yes, guys he's trained with have been caught doping, but it seems like they're down at Flagstaff for a couple months and seek out Abdi. Not really a training group.
so not true
RE: So...is ABDI dirty too? 6/1/2012 7:25AM - in reply to f3wr4wr43 Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
The only real question here is: Since NONE of us here can possibly know the truth - why bother asking the question?
Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 |