Pages: | 1 | 2 |
Osgood
ALAN WEBB 3:39 LOW OR 3:38 HIGH! 4/29/2012 9:48PM Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
You got it first from OSGOOD
osbad
RE: ALAN WEBB 3:39 LOW OR 3:38 HIGH! 4/29/2012 9:50PM - in reply to Osgood Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
WEBB IS BACK BABY!
idiots
RE: ALAN WEBB 3:39 LOW OR 3:38 HIGH! 4/29/2012 9:51PM - in reply to Osgood Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Not good enough to make the team. Sorry Webb bandwagon fans
Ishallnotbeadressed
RE: ALAN WEBB 3:39 LOW OR 3:38 HIGH! 4/29/2012 9:52PM - in reply to Osgood Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
He struggled, probs wont go 3:36 this summer
Woll
RE: ALAN WEBB 3:39 LOW OR 3:38 HIGH! 4/29/2012 9:55PM - in reply to Osgood Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Amazing. Considering this guy was running 3:54 and 1:54 less than a month ago. I think his progression was 3:54->3:43->3:38. So he dropped 11 seconds and then 5 seconds. What is next? A 3:35/3:36? That would be more promising than most would have ever expected coming into this year.
canada Coach
RE: ALAN WEBB 3:39 LOW OR 3:38 HIGH! 4/29/2012 9:55PM - in reply to Osgood Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
#:38.6 in 10th or so
sp!kes
RE: ALAN WEBB 3:39 LOW OR 3:38 HIGH! 4/29/2012 9:55PM - in reply to Ishallnotbeadressed Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
3:53 to 3:42 to 3:39....
results down:(
RE: ALAN WEBB 3:39 LOW OR 3:38 HIGH! 4/29/2012 9:56PM - in reply to sp!kes Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Full results?
sp!kes
RE: ALAN WEBB 3:39 LOW OR 3:38 HIGH! 4/29/2012 9:58PM - in reply to sp!kes Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
how could a lot of people in the US become track fans even of they wanted to? the ghetto web sites crash! are they kidding? what if they had real traffic?! amazing.

I expect nothin less from flotrack
webb is back baby!!!
RE: ALAN WEBB 3:39 LOW OR 3:38 HIGH! 4/29/2012 10:00PM - in reply to results down:( Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
splits?
naming one
RE: ALAN WEBB 3:39 LOW OR 3:38 HIGH! 4/29/2012 10:00PM - in reply to sp!kes Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I've been watching the feed for hours. Didnt mess up until Webbs race came on. Alot of people must have tuned in.
bangalangadanga
RE: ALAN WEBB 3:39 LOW OR 3:38 HIGH! 4/29/2012 10:01PM - in reply to sp!kes Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
webb denied kevin selby an interview.

his hype factor is gonna go through the roof! (not that it already hasn't)
sp!kes
RE: ALAN WEBB 3:39 LOW OR 3:38 HIGH! 4/29/2012 10:03PM - in reply to naming one Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

naming one wrote:

I've been watching the feed for hours. Didnt mess up until Webbs race came on. Alot of people must have tuned in.


obviously thats what happened, genius. if you only how relatively little traffic the site had you would be amazed... and it still went down! running is dead in the US. us losers are counting on low rent flowtrack!? we have no hope.
Osgood
RE: ALAN WEBB 3:39 LOW OR 3:38 HIGH! 4/29/2012 10:07PM - in reply to webb is back baby!!! Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Alan webb just went in the race from the start. He hammered the first 300 and then settled in. I was worried he was starting in too aggressively
Barakus Obama
RE: ALAN WEBB 3:39 LOW OR 3:38 HIGH! 4/29/2012 10:08PM - in reply to Woll Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Woll wrote:

Amazing. Considering this guy was running 3:54 and 1:54 less than a month ago. I think his progression was 3:54->3:43->3:38. So he dropped 11 seconds and then 5 seconds. What is next? A 3:35/3:36? That would be more promising than most would have ever expected coming into this year.


Guys like you talking up Webbs future shape like this shows you have no clue what so ever about running. Webb will not have a chance at the olympics, not the trials and not anything better than 3.35. And that is bad. Crap for a guy like him.

Wake the f**** up.
not over yet2
RE: ALAN WEBB 3:39 LOW OR 3:38 HIGH! 4/29/2012 10:09PM - in reply to Osgood Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
he is getting better and better...... at his current rate of improvement he will be right on his game for the Olympic trials!
oh no you didnt
RE: ALAN WEBB 3:39 LOW OR 3:38 HIGH! 4/29/2012 10:10PM - in reply to Barakus Obama Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Barakus Obama wrote:

[quote]Woll wrote:

Amazing. Considering this guy was running 3:54 and 1:54 less than a month ago. I think his progression was 3:54->3:43->3:38. So he dropped 11 seconds and then 5 seconds. What is next? A 3:35/3:36? That would be more promising than most would have ever expected coming into this year.


Guys like you talking up Webbs future shape like this shows you have no clue what so ever about running. Webb will not have a chance at the olympics, not the trials and not anything better than 3.35. And that is bad. Crap for a guy like him.

Wake the f**** up.[/quote]
I'b break your jaw if i ever met you. You got glass jaw son. Show some respect for Webb bi***.
naming one
RE: ALAN WEBB 3:39 LOW OR 3:38 HIGH! 4/29/2012 10:12PM - in reply to sp!kes Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

sp!kes wrote:

[quote]naming one wrote:

I've been watching the feed for hours. Didnt mess up until Webbs race came on. Alot of people must have tuned in.


obviously thats what happened, genius. if you only how relatively little traffic the site had you would be amazed... and it still went down! running is dead in the US. us losers are counting on low rent flowtrack!? we have no hope.[/quote]



You could have traveled to the meet and watched it in person.
rojo
co-founder
RE: ALAN WEBB 3:39 LOW OR 3:38 HIGH! 4/29/2012 10:13PM - in reply to naming one Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Event 8 Men 1500 Meter Run Section 1
===============================================================
Name Year School Finals
===============================================================
Finals
1 Andy Baddeley New Balance 3:35.19
2 Henrik Ingebrigtsen Aam 3:36.39
3 Zane Robertson Unattached 3:36.53
4 Lawi Lalang Arizona 3:36.77
5 John Bolas Melbourne Tr 3:37.31
6 Craig Miller Melbourne Tr 3:37.48
7 David Bishop Unattached 3:37.51
8 Jeff See Saucony 3:37.60
9 Chris O'Hare Tulsa 3:37.95
10 Taylor Milne Speed River Tfc 3:38.07
11 Alan Webb Nike 3:38.86
12 Geoff Martinson Prince George T&F 3:39.67
13 Jeremy Roff Nswis Sydney 3:40.73
-- Matt Scherer Unattached DNF
oh no you didnt
RE: ALAN WEBB 3:39 LOW OR 3:38 HIGH! 4/29/2012 10:14PM - in reply to rojo Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Thanks alot Rojo but what happened to Arraass? Was he prone to being caught for drug use? Thats prob why he didnt show up
Pages: | 1 | 2 |