Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Idontevenknow
Runner's World Defines a "Serious Runner" 4/27/2012 5:57PM Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
"Busting the 25 minute (5k) barrier marks you as a "serious" runner. It requires a commitment to more mileage and focused workouts, and can take years to achieve."

-Runner's World
keanu
RE: Runner's World Defines a "Serious Runner" 4/27/2012 6:00PM - in reply to Idontevenknow Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
*facepalm*
Idontevenknow
RE: Runner's World Defines a "Serious Runner" 4/27/2012 6:05PM - in reply to keanu Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

keanu wrote:

*facepalm*


You should see what they said about the 20 minute 5k...
really c'mon?
RE: Runner's World Defines a "Serious Runner" 4/27/2012 6:09PM - in reply to Idontevenknow Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
link please
jaygeta
RE: Runner's World Defines a "Serious Runner" 4/27/2012 6:22PM - in reply to Idontevenknow Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
wow, just pathetic....im a 400 runner running 50.'s and i can run 18s and could 3 years ago before i even got serious.
oh please
RE: Runner's World Defines a "Serious Runner" 4/27/2012 6:30PM - in reply to Idontevenknow Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I'm a serious runner it seems.
Idontevenknow
RE: Runner's World Defines a "Serious Runner" 4/27/2012 6:31PM - in reply to really c'mon? Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

really c'mon? wrote:

link please


It's in the latest issue of RW.
are you gonna eat that pussy?
RE: Runner's World Defines a "Serious Runner" 4/27/2012 6:34PM - in reply to Idontevenknow Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Taken out of context. RW is talking about female age groups above 50.
Who are they kidding...
RE: Runner's World Defines a "Serious Runner" 4/27/2012 6:38PM - in reply to Idontevenknow Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I saw that too. Really? 25 min. 5k won't even get you in the top 25% of a small race let alone one over 500 people. I always thought the serious runners were the ones running under 7 min pace, a 38 min 10K or a 1:24 half marathon. Clearly, RW is marketing to a different audience then they claim...
Idontevenknow
RE: Runner's World Defines a "Serious Runner" 4/27/2012 6:41PM - in reply to are you gonna eat that pussy? Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

are you gonna eat that *****? wrote:

Taken out of context. RW is talking about female age groups above 50.


Actually it says nothing about any age group. There's no context that can clarify this statement any further. It's the first 2 sentences in the "Break 25:00" section of the article entitled "Time for a Fast 5-k".

That's all the context you need.
Who are they kidding...
RE: Runner's World Defines a "Serious Runner" 4/27/2012 7:26PM - in reply to Idontevenknow Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Better defined an "average runner" not "serious"
??????????
RE: Runner's World Defines a "Serious Runner" 4/27/2012 7:30PM - in reply to jaygeta Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
no everyone has the talent to run under 25 without training. How serious has nothing to do with time, but effort put into running
Slumdog Billionaire
RE: Runner's World Defines a "Serious Runner" 4/27/2012 7:35PM - in reply to ?????????? Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
The kids whose parents forced them to do cross country would still run 22 minutes, and half their runs were walks in the woods. Anything over 21 minutes for men and 23 for women is too slow to be "serious" unless you're old.
We need help
RE: Runner's World Defines a "Serious Runner" 4/27/2012 8:06PM - in reply to Slumdog Billionaire Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
You haven't been to a HS XC meet in awhile then.
think about it
RE: Runner's World Defines a "Serious Runner" 4/27/2012 8:19PM - in reply to ?????????? Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

?????????? wrote:

no everyone has the talent to run under 25 without training. How serious has nothing to do with time, but effort put into running


And serious runners put in more effort. Kinda the point.
den bosch
RE: Runner's World Defines a "Serious Runner" 4/27/2012 8:37PM - in reply to We need help Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Typical Letsrun delusions about the running world.

At least 90% of people will never run a sub-25 5K. Being in the 10% that does puts you in the "serious" end of the spectrum in terms of running.
wi|fredo
RE: Runner's World Defines a "Serious Runner" 4/27/2012 8:46PM - in reply to den bosch Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

den bosch wrote:

Typical Letsrun delusions about the running world.

At least 90% of people will never run a sub-25 5K. Being in the 10% that does puts you in the "serious" end of the spectrum in terms of running.


No. 90% of men taking running "seriously" will break 25. 90% of people may never break 25, but 95% of people running 5ks don't run seriously
clock puncher
RE: Runner's World Defines a "Serious Runner" 4/27/2012 8:51PM - in reply to Idontevenknow Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
i thought 10000 hours was serious
Elite Hobby Jogger
RE: Runner's World Defines a "Serious Runner" 4/27/2012 8:53PM - in reply to Idontevenknow Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Idontevenknow wrote:

"Busting the 25 minute (5k) barrier marks you as a "serious" runner. It requires a commitment to more mileage and focused workouts, and can take years to achieve."

-Runner's World


Yes!!

Oh wait....now do I have to change my username?
Wow Unbelievable
RE: Runner's World Defines a "Serious Runner" 4/27/2012 8:58PM - in reply to Elite Hobby Jogger Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Most runners now are slow. They are very slow. In relative terms, 25:00 for 5k is semi-serious. There are a lot of 10:00 per mile and slower folks out there now. They pay their entry fees.
Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |