| Tiger_runner |
| ||
|
Think about it, the work of getting your hangover level down to perform without suspicion. Acting sober for most of the day. The logistics seem hard for planning everything out. Also the job must be a desk slave sort of position with supervision by unapproving superiors/peers |
| stumbler |
| ||
|
Doing the math, let's start with 168 hrs in a week. If the 100 miles were run at an average of 7 minutes per mile, they would take 11.7 hrs. Thus, 168 - (100 hrs of work) - (11.7 hrs running) = 56 hrs to drink 100 beers and sleep If you slept 4 hrs per night (28 hrs for the week), that would leave 28 hrs to drink 100 beer. This would leave you ~3.6 min per beer, assuming that you drank constantly every waking moment. Obviously, this model assumes a job in which one is not allowed to drink at work. I'm going to say it's something no one should ever try, unless you hate your job and want to go out on a weird note. PS: I have worked > 100 hr weeks in the past. |
| Tiger_runner |
| ||
|
Same to me, I would never try this. But to assume you could gamble moderate drinking throughout your workday, taking on that risk you might be able to win. Running is about sacrifices after all, career's shouldn't be held to a higher standard. After reflecting on this is it possible to deduce this to logic. That 2 productive extremes in running and working combined with 1 unproductive extreme in drinking lead to explosive downward spiral? |
| math |
| ||
|
Actually I believe your beer calculations are off... 28 hours to drink 100 beers. 28 hours * 60 minutes = 1680 minutes. 1680 minutes/100 beers = 16.8 minutes per beer---more plausible than 3.6. one could even do 5 hours of sleep and 3 of beer and have 12.6 minutes per beer... |
| jimjamesrunner |
| ||
|
I believe it's the 3k vodka steeplechase. http://www.beermile.com/display/event_823 |