now you know
TIKI GELENA 2:18:57 4TH FASTEST WOMAN IN HISTORY 4/15/2012 11:40PM Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
1 2:15:25 Paula Radcliffe
2 2:17:18 Paula Radcliffe
3 2:17:42 Paula Radcliffe
4 2:18:20 Liliya Shobukhova
5 2:18:47 Catherine N'dereba
6 2:18:56 Paula Radcliffe
7 2:18:57 Tika Gelana

very impressive must say i did not see it coming?
4th all time and now second amongst africans, amazing how africans are still not at the top of the marathoning game for woman. this by comparison to men who dominate men's marathoning since many years.
gelena will now be a lock for the olympics with her credentials as the new record holder amongst ethiopians.

elsewhere, paula finished in 1:11:50. my previous prediction was been 1:09:50.
kevin azn boyss
RE: TIKI GELENA 2:18:57 4TH FASTEST WOMAN IN HISTORY 4/16/2012 4:52AM - in reply to now you know Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Tiki Gelana makes Mary Keitany pb time look slow. I think mary keitany have some improvements in her unless she have a bad race.
kevin azn boyss
RE: TIKI GELENA 2:18:57 4TH FASTEST WOMAN IN HISTORY 4/16/2012 7:29AM - in reply to kevin azn boyss Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Mary Keitany didn't run as fast as tiki because her london halfway split was 1:10:37. She could've run 2:18:57 if she split 1:10:15 for the first half. Mary doesn't need to go out conservatively over 1:10:00 for the half marathon.
26mi235
RE: TIKI GELENA 2:18:57 4TH FASTEST WOMAN IN HISTORY 4/16/2012 8:37AM - in reply to kevin azn boyss Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I doubt she was much faster for the second half than Gelena. She finished in about 3:00 for the last K, passing the men in the vicinity.
kevin azn boyss
RE: TIKI GELENA 2:18:57 4TH FASTEST WOMAN IN HISTORY 4/17/2012 10:01AM - in reply to kevin azn boyss Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Tiki would've beaten Irina Mikitenko had she run london marathon. It's important to beat Irina because she defeated many strong ethiopians like atsede habtamu aberu kebede askale tafa.