Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
joecrunner
Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/14/2012 9:44PM Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
http://www.goprincetontigers.com/ViewArticle.dbml?SPID=4268&DB_OEM_ID=10600&ATCLID=205413919

Much better result. He did this double too when he was with Alberto if I recall.
bangalangadanga
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/14/2012 9:48PM - in reply to joecrunner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
just noticed this. looks strikingly similar to the 1500/5000 double he did this time last year. although, that was in march of 2011 if i renimber right.

WEBB IS BACK BABY!!
webbbber
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/14/2012 9:48PM - in reply to joecrunner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
What was the double times when he did it with Alberto?
joecrunner
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/14/2012 9:49PM - in reply to joecrunner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
http://www.letsrun.com/2010/alan-webb0828.php

He ran 3:41/14:15 in August 2010. He later ran 3:37 and 3:36.

Now he's running similar times in April, so I'd say he and Vig know what they are doing.
casual commentary
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/14/2012 9:49PM - in reply to joecrunner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I still believe!!!
crazy person
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/14/2012 9:52PM - in reply to joecrunner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I'm gonna take this as the real result. At this rate, Webb should be running 3:22 in two races. Nice.
The Waterboy
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/14/2012 9:52PM - in reply to casual commentary Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
whats better, a 1:54 or 14:15?
joecrunner
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/14/2012 9:53PM - in reply to The Waterboy Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
3:43.28 is equal to 1:49 and 14:15 is equal to 1:52/3:50.
Ghola
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/14/2012 10:15PM - in reply to The Waterboy Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
The 5k is a few percent closer to his PR, plus it's a double so presumably not a 100% effort.
Dennis Reynolds
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/14/2012 10:17PM - in reply to Ghola Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Not terrible.
troller of trolls
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/14/2012 10:19PM - in reply to joecrunner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
but was he relaxed?
i kinda like running
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/14/2012 10:20PM - in reply to bangalangadanga Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
How does this indicate that Webb is "back"? That's 13 seconds off his PR for 1500m. And the 5000m time is more than a minute off his PR.
CTA
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/14/2012 10:42PM - in reply to joecrunner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
TALENT NEVER GOES AWAY WEBB IS BACK SNITCHES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
the average male runner
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/14/2012 10:47PM - in reply to CTA Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
how is a 14:15 good for a 13:10 runner?
dean moriarty
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/14/2012 10:48PM - in reply to joecrunner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Hey, that's great news! From the results, looks like he got nicked at the line by a few dudes in the 1500 and broke away late to win the 5000. But was anyone there with some play-by-play?
i was there
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/14/2012 10:53PM - in reply to dean moriarty Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Mike Banks and Andrew Springer were ahead of him going into the last 150m and then Joe Stilin got him and Springer at the line.
bangalangadanga
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/14/2012 10:56PM - in reply to dean moriarty Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Where the hell was flotrack? I feel like we're back in the dark ages waiting for links (that don't work until 10 o'clock) to scroll through results pages.
joecrunner
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/14/2012 10:58PM - in reply to the average male runner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
It was probably a go with the flow, for the win kinda thing. Not like a workout, but like just following the leader and then going for it that last lap.
Middle Distance Coach
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/14/2012 11:32PM - in reply to joecrunner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I would be more encouraged if it had been 3:35 and 13:45. Those kind of results would have indicated something substantial was at hand.
casual commentary
RE: Webb 3:43.28/14:15.54 Double 4/14/2012 11:45PM - in reply to Middle Distance Coach Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
It was most likely a workout effort. These results are very promising. Can't wait to see what he'll do next! Alan in London would rock.
Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |