Categorically
Most overlooked 3:57 of the year 2/13/2009 7:27AM Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
People said Dorian Ulrey's race was the most overlooked 3:57 because the focus after the race was all about German. But how about Shane Knoll's 3:57 at the Meyo Invite? That race featured 5 sub 4 performances by collegians. A significant portion of the men at the starting line at NCAAs will come from that race alone. Yet it has gotten no recognition. The Brojos didn't even mention it in the week that was. It was a fine race by those guys.
agreed sir
RE: Most overlooked 3:57 of the year 2/13/2009 9:14AM - in reply to Categorically Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Great race.
Tony Soprano
RE: Most overlooked 3:57 of the year 2/13/2009 9:35AM - in reply to agreed sir Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I interviewed him a few nights ago!

REEEEEEAD!

http://www.flotrack.org/articles/view/790-shane-knoll-kwik-e
outdoors starts in april
RE: Most overlooked 3:57 of the year 2/13/2009 10:46AM - in reply to Categorically Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
try it on a regular indoor track in a real race. i actually find it depressing, not inspiring, that most of the ncaa qualifiers are going to come from that "race" on that "indoor track"
Duffman
RE: Most overlooked 3:57 of the year 2/13/2009 10:54AM - in reply to Tony Soprano Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Lame interview (his fault, not yours).
littlemeatchunks
RE: Most overlooked 3:57 of the year 2/13/2009 10:55AM - in reply to outdoors starts in april Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
. . . except it was run indoors. they don't call it "200m track season."
asfsf
RE: Most overlooked 3:57 of the year 2/13/2009 1:09PM - in reply to littlemeatchunks Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I don't care where you run 3:57, as long as you did it.


I can't believe people aren't impressed...you guys must be f***in' 3:20 milers or something.
rupps strength
RE: Most overlooked 3:57 of the year 2/13/2009 1:19PM - in reply to Categorically Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Categorically wrote:

People said Dorian Ulrey's race was the most overlooked 3:57 because the focus after the race was all about German. But how about Shane Knoll's 3:57 at the Meyo Invite? That race featured 5 sub 4 performances by collegians. A significant portion of the men at the starting line at NCAAs will come from that race alone. Yet it has gotten no recognition. The Brojos didn't even mention it in the week that was. It was a fine race by those guys.


I thought the same thing at first but there are a few reasons.
1) The fact that a freshman (GF) won his first ever indoor race and did it in 3:56 makes every thing else seem a little less exciting, naturally.
2) German and Dorian did this early, in fact Dorian had already flown out to Seattle and completed his second and 3rd race (a 3:54 1600 outkicking an olympian, yeah he was ill but the time speaks for itself) and then comes back to win the 3K in 7:50. And that was ever they had some serious travel problems. This was all done a week prior to the race your are talking about.
3) You now have Lagat and Willis making 3:57 look casual as they run 3:51 & 3:53 respectively on smaller tracks, and about 12 other marks landed on the same weekend between 3:54-3:59.

So really as impressive as these guys ran, and it was impressive, it was just overshadowed by too many other impressive events. High school 2K records. German smacking down great runners at US cross juniors. Lagat & Willis getting near 3:50. Flanagan's 5K record. Shoot, Rupp PR's by a long margin in the 3K splitting some world class Ethiopian and gets very little respect for it and is called a Bridesmaid.

So unforunately for your boys, their times were fast, but the timing of that race couldn't have been worse for getting recognition.

No doubt, it was worth mentioning in the week that was.
Thin Head
RE: Most overlooked 3:57 of the year 2/13/2009 1:20PM - in reply to asfsf Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

asfsf wrote:

I don't care where you run 3:57, as long as you did it.


I can't believe people aren't impressed...you guys must be f***in' 3:20 milers or something.



Duh!

What're you new here or something?
asfsf
RE: Most overlooked 3:57 of the year 2/13/2009 1:25PM - in reply to Thin Head Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Thin Head wrote:

[quote]asfsf wrote:

I don't care where you run 3:57, as long as you did it.


I can't believe people aren't impressed...you guys must be f***in' 3:20 milers or something.



Duh!

What're you new here or something?[/quote]


Haha I've been on here for a very long time, but thanks for putting me back into perspective. The only way that 3:57 would be impressive is if it were on in Alaska on a track covered in snow, right?
grammar check
RE: Most overlooked 3:57 of the year 2/14/2009 1:00AM - in reply to Tony Soprano Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

Tony Soprano wrote:

I interviewed him a few nights ago!

REEEEEEAD!

http://www.flotrack.org/articles/view/790-shane-knoll-kwik-e


"I haven't ran 55s for quarters at all this season." This should read: "I haven't [run] 55s for quarters at all this season."