Tim Goldsack
Mekonnen and Willis DQed 3/8/2008 1:08PM Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Willis 5th and Mekonnen wins, but both are dqed

1 205 Daniel Kipchirchir Komen KEN 3:38.54 .
2 92 Juan Carlos Higuero ESP 3:38.82 .
3 91 Arturo Casado ESP 3:38.88 .
4 44 Rashid Ramzi BRN 3:40.26 .
5 109 Mekonnen Gebremedhin ETH 3:40.42 .
6 206 Suleiman Kipses Simotwo KEN 3:41.04 .
7 221 Youssef Baba MAR 3:44.50 .
. 243 Nicholas Willis NZL DQ .
. 110 Deresse Mekonnen ETH DQ .
werweoijoitt
RE: Mekonnen and Willis DQed 3/8/2008 1:13PM - in reply to Tim Goldsack Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Ramzi is not looking so hot. It will be interesting to see if he can get into shape by the Olympics. Why was Mekonnen DQed?
Well
RE: Mekonnen and Willis DQed 3/8/2008 2:37PM - in reply to Tim Goldsack Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Wow, really? I didn't see anything in the race that was DQ worthy...
runner.
RE: Mekonnen and Willis DQed 3/8/2008 2:41PM - in reply to Well Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
They showed a replay of the race and Mekonnen took one step off the track going round a bend and Willis took three steps off the track when going round the bend. It seems pretty unfair to disqualify Mekonnen when he was nost likely pushed and 1 foot off the track is hardly going to give you an advantage....
coachkritter
RE: Mekonnen and Willis DQed 3/8/2008 2:42PM - in reply to Well Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Willis dq'ed for looking behind more than 4 times/lap.
hardy har har
RE: Mekonnen and Willis DQed 3/8/2008 3:13PM - in reply to coachkritter Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Willis ... whachew talkin 'bout????
weetard
RE: Mekonnen and Willis DQed 3/8/2008 3:30PM - in reply to Tim Goldsack Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Nicholas Willis CAN DQ

it should be right? not NZL?
asdfasdfasdfsdf
RE: Mekonnen and Willis DQed 3/8/2008 3:42PM - in reply to weetard Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

weetard wrote:

Nicholas Willis CAN DQ

it should be right? not NZL?


uhhhhh.... are you thinking of brannen?
Harry Kooter
RE: Mekonnen and Willis DQed 3/8/2008 3:45PM - in reply to weetard Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

weetard wrote:

Nicholas Willis CAN DQ

it should be right? not NZL?


If they were trying to make a statement about his ability to DQ, yes, it should say "Nicholas Willis can DQ". The NZL is his nationality though, so it's correct.
appeal.
RE: Mekonnen and Willis DQed 3/8/2008 3:52PM - in reply to Harry Kooter Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Mekonnen filed an appeal and was reinstated as the winner.

http://www.iaaf.org/documents/pdf/3656/AT-1500-M-f--1--.RS1.pdf
DeeQueed
RE: Mekonnen and Willis DQed 3/8/2008 6:50PM - in reply to appeal. Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Willis trying to cheat again. Let me guess? He sat at the back of the pack, and tried to get towed around like usual. He will never be as good as Walker. Walker runs with balls. Willis runs like a sheep. Baaa
the former mobile9
RE: Mekonnen and Willis DQed 3/8/2008 6:54PM - in reply to DeeQueed Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I'm gonna guess that you didn't watch the race.
Fatslowoldguy
RE: Mekonnen and Willis DQed 3/9/2008 8:36AM - in reply to the former mobile9 Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Did you watch the race?
I orginally posted he step off 4 different times. Last night I watched the replay. He was off the track at least 5 different times. Approximately at the 600m mark, 900m, 1150, 1200 and 1400. I was dumbfounded when the results came up and he was 5th. I thought it was as clear a dq as I've seen. It's the World indoor 1500m champs, not the World infield 1500m.
X Runner
RE: Mekonnen and Willis DQed 3/9/2008 9:28AM - in reply to werweoijoitt Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

werweoijoitt wrote:

Ramzi is not looking so hot. It will be interesting to see if he can get into shape by the Olympics. Why was Mekonnen DQed?


Last year Ramzi almost took Gold offer little training and no races.
He is now way ahead of last year.
An Official
RE: Mekonnen and Willis DQed 3/9/2008 10:28AM - in reply to Tim Goldsack Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
It needs to be at least 3 CONSECUTIVE steps in the same occurence not one.
Asterix
RE: Mekonnen and Willis DQed 3/9/2008 11:11AM - in reply to An Official Reply | Return to Index | Report Post

An Official wrote:

It needs to be at least 3 CONSECUTIVE steps in the same occurence not one.


Which rule makes this statement about 3 consecutive steps?

There is nothing in Rule 163 about that:

http://iaaf.org/mm/Document/imported/42192.pdf
the point could be
RE: Mekonnen and Willis DQed 3/9/2008 11:55AM - in reply to Tim Goldsack Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
would really appreciate video replay. Anybody know how for those who missed?
Official
RE: Mekonnen and Willis DQed 3/9/2008 3:00PM - in reply to Asterix Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
he must not have gained an advantage or impeded anyone.
youtube
RE: Mekonnen and Willis DQed 3/10/2008 2:59AM - in reply to Official Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
An Official
RE: Mekonnen and Willis DQed 3/16/2008 9:24AM - in reply to Asterix Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Your correct. I went to my USATF Annual Officials Clinic yesterday and the USATF and IAFF require only one step for a DQ. However,he won the appeal maybe because he won and one step if he did it was decided not o be enough as he did not gain an advantage or imped anyone.