Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
morning runner
No more D1 Track regionals? 11/26/2007 6:56PM Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
heard a rumor that the NCAA is abolishing regionals in favor of a 11 day "super 64 / sweet 16" format. Basically all conference champions and the 36 fastest runners (excluding cc) for each event compete over 4 days in separate heats until 16 remain, then 3 day break and the sweet 16 begins.

any word on this? whats the rational? why don't they just redraw the regions?
ncaa say what
RE: No more D1 Track regionals? 11/26/2007 7:13PM - in reply to morning runner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
bump
distance pirate
RE: No more D1 Track regionals? 11/26/2007 7:27PM - in reply to ncaa say what Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I heard that they will make everyone run in turkey suits and that Skuj will be employed by the NCAA to personally blow every champion.

B---S--t.
Midnight Runner
RE: No more D1 Track regionals? 11/26/2007 8:13PM - in reply to distance pirate Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
The only B.S. is this new system. You may think it is not real but it is very real. You are laughing now but you won't be laughing for long. morning runner doesn't joke around about stuff like this.
morning runner
RE: No more D1 Track regionals? 11/26/2007 8:16PM - in reply to Midnight Runner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
its like they are trying to turn this into basketball. i don't understand the rational, its going to end up being multiple races in a short time span. plus its going to lead to a lot of standard chasing and not racing
i hate that #@$ commerical
RE: No more D1 Track regionals? 11/26/2007 8:21PM - in reply to morning runner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
i believe this new format will favor a young man named Deacon Kearney, 800 meter runner for Saint Joseph's University.
daylight runner
RE: No more D1 Track regionals? 11/26/2007 8:51PM - in reply to i hate that #@$ commerical Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
salt is my jam
la bummalatala
RE: No more D1 Track regionals? 11/26/2007 8:51PM - in reply to i hate that #@$ commerical Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
BUMP
TROLL
BUMP
TROLL

Errors:
You have been banned from posting on this forum.


Time for the daylight runner to come out.
Sal Paradise
RE: No more D1 Track regionals? 11/26/2007 8:53PM - in reply to la bummalatala Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
God, this thread is such a joke. Can no one be serious.
daylight runner
RE: No more D1 Track regionals? 11/26/2007 8:53PM - in reply to daylight runner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
so is potassium

and this is what happens to a genuine grapvevine bona fida rumor
Salt is my jam what can i say
RE: No more D1 Track regionals? 11/26/2007 8:54PM - in reply to daylight runner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Why is the sky blue?
college kid
RE: No more D1 Track regionals? 11/26/2007 9:28PM - in reply to Salt is my jam what can i say Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
its being reflected off the trees
perspective
RE: No more D1 Track regionals? 11/26/2007 9:40PM - in reply to morning runner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I've read through the 15 page explanation and I like the one site super 64/sweet-16 format. The one element that seemed questionable was the automatic berth to the super 64 for any conference champion. We all know that some conferences are tough and some are weak. At the same time, it still leaves, at minimum, 34 to 36 spots to qualify from the descending order list. In reality, a good number of the conference champions will already have top times, so it will probably be that the top 50 from the descending order list will go the super 64. What's also nice, is that the 16 who go on to the NCAA championships won't have to fly again, but can just stay at the competition site and get ready to compete.

All in all, I'm amazed at how good an arrangement this is. Well done to the group who put it together!
Runner Z
RE: No more D1 Track regionals? 11/26/2007 11:40PM - in reply to perspective Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Cost in dollars and re-imbursement protocol please? 11 days is a long time plus ticket change costs if athletes are eliminated?
So what your saying is?
RE: No more D1 Track regionals? 11/26/2007 11:50PM - in reply to morning runner Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Wait a minute! So a 10k runner has to run two in the 11 day period? And perhaps get there by winning conference? And probably run one or two more chasing the mark in case they don't win conference. Nice planning to kill the 10k runner if that's how it works...
sickness
RE: No more D1 Track regionals? 11/26/2007 11:53PM - in reply to So what your saying is? Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Every D1 xc runner runs two 10ks in 10 days already.
runSE
RE: No more D1 Track regionals? 11/26/2007 11:56PM - in reply to So what your saying is? Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I'm trying to picture exactly what a runner will be doing for 11 days. Can someone explain the whole scenario? Let's take the 800. So all the conference champs plus next 34 or whatever fastest times show up at some site. On day one they...
So what your saying is?
RE: No more D1 Track regionals? 11/26/2007 11:57PM - in reply to sickness Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
Apples and oranges comparing xc and track 10ks. Especially if the athlete is running more than two in the 11 days,which they must.
perspective
RE: No more D1 Track regionals? 11/27/2007 6:11AM - in reply to So what your saying is? Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
A 10k runner will run once in the Super64 time slot and be looking to place 16th. (or higher). Then he/she will race again in the finals the next week in the Sweet 16. The same is true for the 5000. The steeple guy will have to run two rounds in the Super64, then progress to a final.

The 100-1500 guys will do two rounds in the Super64 and two rounds in the Sweet16. Field events will do two rounds in the Super64 and in the Sweet 16.

The NCAA will pick up costs for those who make the Sweet 16.
A college Coach...
RE: No more D1 Track regionals? 11/27/2007 6:52AM - in reply to perspective Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
This is not in the best interest of the athlete or the NCAA. No athlete in a distance event would be able to double at nationals. This in turn will water down the fields and bring slow times in the final. The race will not go to the best in the field, but the one who can survive the rounds... Maybe this isn't a bad thing for my program, but for the NCAA it is not the best.
Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |